Former aide to Donald Trump has proposed a potential rationale behind the decision of the 47th U.S. president to demolish the East Wing of the White House and replace it with a $250 million ballroom. Crews initiated the deconstruction process on Monday to pave the way for the new ballroom, sparking controversy domestically and internationally.

Speculation has arisen regarding the timing and speed of the ongoing work, coinciding with Trump’s recent announcement of plans to erect an Arc de Triomphe-inspired monument in Washington. Dubbed the ‘Arc De Trump,’ the monument aims to commemorate the upcoming 250th anniversary of the United States. However, skeptics question whether these projects, including the new ballroom, are part of Trump’s legacy agenda.

An ex-aide, speaking to the Telegraph, suggested that Trump’s sense of mortality might be the driving force behind his decisions to dismantle and reconstruct key sections of the nation’s political hub. The individual expressed that Trump seeks a legacy that reflects his efforts to rebuild the nation and its governance, emphasizing the necessity of deconstruction before reconstruction—a quintessential characteristic of Trump’s approach.

On-site workers also shared their perspectives, with one describing the pace of the construction as “remarkable.” Meanwhile, a contractor, Joe, expressed optimism about the project’s future appearance despite its current state as a large excavation site. While some have praised the anticipated structure’s potential, others, including historians and political figures, have criticized the initiative.

Elaine Kamarck, a former White House official, labeled the construction as “typical Trump,” deeming it an eyesore and representative of the public’s growing disillusionment with the president. Historian Jonathan Alter noted that the project not only embodies Trump’s architectural taste but also signifies his governing style in his second term, likening it to a wrecking ball symbolizing the erosion of the rule of law.

This development has stirred mixed reactions, reflecting the divisive nature of Trump’s endeavors as he aims to leave a lasting imprint on the nation’s capital.