As the former bus driver who ascended to power as Venezuela’s de facto leader, many individuals are likely relieved to witness the departure of Nicholas Maduro.

However, the method by which Donald Trump facilitated his removal has once again disrupted global norms. Beyond the actions taken against Venezuela, this event highlights another instance of the US President’s assertive foreign policy. Trump’s ambitions extend to acquiring Greenland and regaining control of the Panama Canal, underscoring his commitment to pursuing strategic goals. The lack of clear international endorsement for the US intervention in Venezuela raises concerns about the legality of their actions.

While some may argue that Maduro, who followed in the footsteps of Hugo Chavez and oversaw a progressively authoritarian regime, lacked legitimacy, Venezuela’s descent into economic turmoil is undeniable. Once a vibrant and prosperous nation, Venezuela has now become a shadow of its former self. Despite the opposition’s apparent victory in the 2024 presidential election, the global community generally does not view electoral outcomes as sufficient grounds for forcibly changing a government.

The presence of valuable oil resources in Venezuela undoubtedly influenced the US stance, particularly in safeguarding the interests of Chevron, a major American oil company operating in the region. After months of escalating military pressure, the US found itself compelled to take action. The operation was not primarily motivated by anti-narcotics efforts, as evidenced by the extensive military buildup in the Caribbean. While the details are still emerging, the outcome appears to be a strategic triumph for Trump, signaling a setback for Venezuela’s traditional allies such as Russia, China, and Iran.

Nevertheless, the United Kingdom, which distanced itself from the military intervention in Venezuela, now faces a dilemma. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European leaders are likely uneasy about the questionable legality of the operation. While Maduro’s departure may offer hope for Venezuela’s future, the manner in which it was orchestrated raises concerns about the broader implications for global order. The US’s evolving role as a revisionist power challenging existing norms places strain on its allies, who have traditionally relied on American leadership to uphold democratic values and free trade principles.

This situation underscores the complexities of international relations and the shifting dynamics within the global arena.